Aug 24 2008
I’m still reading a lot of complaining about Orozco’s red card, most recently Fullback, who remembered some particularly dubious anti-US officiating by Wolfgang Stark, who sent Orozco off. And almost immediately after the game, Ives, being more mild-mannered, wrote:
Orozco can’t throw an elbow of any kind, but the referee did not have to give a red card that early in the match. The elbow wasn’t at the face or a full-swing strike. It was an innocuous swing that led to an award-winning acting job by Solomon Okoronkwo. That didn’t matter as much as the fact that Orozco lost his cool, leaving it up to the judgment of a referee to determine his fate.
Although he clearly blames Orozco for his action, this is an argument we’ve all used when a game-changing call affects our team at certain spots, “The ref can’t make that call that early in the game.” Let’s get that phrase out of our system. A red card or a penalty or even a late free kick in a dangerous spot, at any time of the game, should be called regardless of whether it’s at the beginning, the middle, or the end of the game - or if it winds up determining the game. You can argue whether or not the call was valid, but the clock should not enter into it.
When play resumed following Orozco’s dismissal, the U.S. had the ball. This means that a foul was called against Okoronkwo before the elbow was thrown. Therefore, Orozco’s elbow was judged as an act of retaliation, which is an automatic red, regardless of Okoronkwo’s reaction or where he was hit. The intent to retaliate was obvious, and Stark had no other option but to send him off. Naturally, this was missed by JP and ‘Celo, who acknowledged that the call was just, but didn’t put it in the proper context.
And yes, Galaxy fans, Gallardo should have been sent off for his elbow on Donovan for the exact same thing. But i still maintain that every call that doesn’t go the Galaxy’s way is karma for years of Ruiz’s late penalties.
